Timing issues: Difference between revisions

From Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Sanders, Andrew J. <AJSanders@mednet.ucla.edu>
11/24/14


Hi Samantha,
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
10/27/14


I am emailing because I remember you mentioning your lab is beginning to use Netstation 5.
to supportteam, Austin
Hi EGI support,


Our collaborators in Boston have run into some issues with processing in Netstation 5 and are looking to see if others are experiencing similar issues.
We're in the process of transitioning Net Station 5 into our EEG testing and have been running into some issues:


Would you mind answering some of their questions, or putting them in contact with someone in your lab who may be more familiar with processing in NS5?
1)  We deliver our stimuli and manage our events from MATLAB.  With that said, when we send simultaneous events from MATLAB to Net Station, it says in the event log that "events that exist at the same time as existing events will not be added".  Is there a way to fix this issue?  There are some experiments in our lab that depend in sending simultaneous events and this would present a big problem.  This was not an issue that we had with earlier versions of Net Station.


Thanks!!
2)  The events that we send to Net Station from MATLAB are recorded properly as they occur in time in the event log; however, when opening the recorded file in Net Station Review, all of the events have the same onset time and occur at the end of the recording, though durations of all events are preserved.  We haven't had timing issues in the past and are wondering if there is a set up feature involving timing that we overlooked.
 
If you could help us solve these issues, this would be great.
 
Thanks,
Sam


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 24, 2014, at 2:02 PM, Jeste, Shafali M.D. wrote:
Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com>
10/28/14
 
to me, supportteam, Austin
Dear Samantha,


NO and this is intentional :) However my collaborator Mark Cohen is, and I’m sure would be happy to talk with you.  
Are you using psychtoolbox? We are investigating a timing issue with the synch method used by Psychtoolbox. Do you have a script known to work with an older version of NS I could test with
I’m cc’ing Andrew who can connect you to the right person in his lab.


SSJ
I'll need to investigate a bit more on how you were doing simultaneous events before. That was during acquisition I assume?


Shafali Spurling Jeste, MD
Can you remind me which lab you are at?
Assistant Professor in Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
 
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
Thanks,
Director, Electrophysiology Core
 
UCLA Center for Autism Research and Treatment
Mark
760 Westwood Plaza
Semel Institute, Room 68-237B
lab: 310-825-2761
clinic: 310-794-4008


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 24, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Faja, Susan <Susan.Faja@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to Mark, supportteam, Austin
Hi Mark,
 
Thanks for your reply!


Hi Shefali,
Yes - we are using Psychtoolbox.  I'll see if Austin (the one having trouble with the simultaneous events) can send you some code. And yes - we were delivering simultaneous events during acquisition.
Hope you are hanging in there with the U19 stuff. Thanks so much for all your help last week while you were out of the country!


Quick question: Has your lab been using Netstation 5 at all yet?
We're in Mark Cohen's lab at UCLA.


We're trying to set up a new system in my lab in Boston and have run into some issues with processing and just wanted to see if other users are experiencing similar things.  
Send you some code in a bit.


Thanks,  
Thanks,  
Susan
Sam
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com>
10/28/14
 
to me, supportteam, Austin
Dear Samantha,
 
I'll need to investigate the issues separately, so if you have an experiment known to run in 4.5 that does not have simultaneous events, that would be perfect.


--
Thanks,
Susan Faja, Ph.D.
Labs of Cognitive Neuroscience | BCH3178
Boston Children’s Hospital | 1 Autumn Street | AU459 | Boston, MA 02215
617-919-4486 | susan.faja@childrens.harvard.edu


Mark


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
11/25/14
10/28/14


to Andrew, Susan, Tessa, Shafali
to Mark
Hi Andrew,
Oh ok - great.  Sounds good.


We have not gotten to the stage of processing data as of yet - we've been having data collection timing issues with Psychtoolbox and NS5.  Because we haven't collected data accurately yet, we haven't looked into processing.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
Attachments10/28/14


If I can hear what kind of processing issues your collaborators have been having, I can address those to Mark Moran, our connect at EGIIt'll be good for us to know of these issues as well, for we're looking to do some processing using NetStation5 once we have it up and running.
to me
Here's the script. Hold off on sending it; I want to confirm that it
works in 4.5 first.
 
Attachments area
Preview attachment testNS5.m
 
Binary File
testNS5.m
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to me
Use this version. It works in NS 4.5 just fine.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to Austin
Perfect!  Thanks Austin!
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to Mark, supportteam, Austin
Hi Mark,  
 
Here's a code that works fine in NS 4.5 that's been having timing issues in NS 5Let us know how it goes.


Thanks,  
Thanks,  
Sam
Samantha​
testNS5.m
 
Attachments area
Preview attachment testNS5.m
 
Binary File
testNS5.m
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to me
I'd like to point out another issue. Whenever the recording stops, NS forces you to enter a new patient ID before you can interact with the program again. This is very disruptive, particularly when a user does not intend to save new data. If I have finished my session, I shouldn't have to enter a new dummy patient ID (e.g. "asdf") just to look scroll down.
 
This behavior may be a design choice to prevent users from accidentally running a session without entering the patient ID, but there is a bigger problem. The prompt for the patient ID causes Net Station to remain as the topmost window even if users click to other programs (including Finder, Safari, System Preferences, etc.). The program should never capture focus in that manner. I discovered this bug because I was trying to open Finder to determine the next unused subject number, but the window was not visible. I was forced to enter a placeholder ID so that I could use Finder before re-entering the correct ID.
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to me
Do you want me to email him directly?
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell
Yeah, that would be best. Mind sending your email to him?
10/28/14
 
Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
10/28/14
 
to me
Sure. I'll email him.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeste, Shafali M.D. <SJeste@mednet.ucla.edu>
Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com>
11/26/14
10/28/14


to Susan, me, Andrew, Tessa
to me, supportteam, Austin
UGH this sounds painful. However it is also a reality that we all will have to switch at some point, so working through the growing pains together will be helpful. I was just able to convince them to sell me another net amps 300, but they will only sell it with NS5 due to the computer/mac issues. However we are trying to scheme ways to work around that issue as I prefer to stick with 4.5 for now.
Dear Samantha,


At some point a work group on this will probably be in order.
Thank you, That's just what I needed.


SSJ
Thanks,


Shafali Spurling Jeste, MD
Mark
Assistant Professor in Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
Director, Electrophysiology Core
UCLA Center for Autism Research and Treatment
760 Westwood Plaza
Semel Institute, Room 68-237B
lab: 310-825-2761
clinic: 310-794-4008


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 25, 2014, at 11:18 PM, Faja, Susan <Susan.Faja@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com>
10/29/14
 
to me, supportteam, Austin
Dear Sam,
 
I have verified your code works in 4.5 but not in 5.0, I've turned the issue over to the programmers and will let you know what a fix is available.


Hi Sam et al.,
Thanks,
We've been in touch with Mark Moran and EGI support a lot as we've had a whole slew of processing problems. 
I won't go into detail about our 'important but not critical list', but would be happy to send more if it's helpful. Some of the most critical issues are:


1) Temporal relations have been removed from the Segmentation Tool - this means that you can only segment to 1 thing and it just becomes 0 in your segment. In NS 4, we typically segmented to stim, but also pulled in criteria related to the accuracy and type of the previous trial. This is no longer a possibility. We also used a photocel during our acquisition to confirm timing and segmented to stim + DIN. Also no longer an option. Mark worked with us for about a week on a workaround. I ended up reprogramming. Mark tells us that EGI decided that NS users don't need temporal relations, but that he continues to lobby for it. If you would like to see this feature, please let him know we're not the only lab that used it.
Mark


2) The bad trials from artifact detection get reincorporated in later processing steps. (i.e. they don't stay bad). EGI is aware of this bug and telling us it'll be corrected in a later version.  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sam O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
10/30/14


3) NS averaging tool doesn't work - all the channels get marked as bad and zeroed out. Again, EGI is aware of this and telling us it'll be corrected in a later version.
to Agatha
I guess I can try your code and see if we're running into similar issues, but I'm guessing so because of PTB


4) NS 5 doesn't have stat extraction. EGI is aware of this and telling us it'll be corrected in a later version.  
Sam O'Connell
samroconnell@gmail.com
(847) 915-5355


Re. 3 & 4, EGI recently told us that it's not been a problem for their other users because they are simply not processing in NS 5. This seemed bizarre to us. We are trying to unpack this by reaching out to labs that have EGI systems to see whether they are using 5 yet and what alternatives they've come up with. (We've also been on the EGI user group to learn about exporting to Matlab for ERPlab. The EEG signal exports, but it's unclear whether the NS tags can be exported--We're following up on some very cumbersome workarounds from John Richards who posted today).  
Staff Research Associate
Staglin Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, UCLA
www.brainmapping.org
Think Now, Inc.
www.think-now.com


Tessa, feel free to chime in if I have missed anything critical in this summary.
Begin forwarded message:


Thanks so much for letting us know where you are at with things and let us know if we can be helpful.  
From: Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com>
Date: October 29, 2014 at 3:49:46 PM PDT
To: Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
Cc: "supportteam@egi.com" <supportteam@egi.com>, Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NS 5 events


-Susan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agatha Lenartowicz <alenarto@ucla.edu>
10/30/14


p.s. Shefali, thanks! When I arrived in Boston, NA400 and NS5 were the only products shipping from Eugene. We get so sad when we see NS4 on Chuck's computers now. Oh the good old days...
to me
Yes pls do. You ought to get Andrew on this as well.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Faja, Susan <Susan.Faja@childrens.harvard.edu>
Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com>
11/26/14
11/3/14
 
to Mark, me, supportteam
Dear Mark,
 
I'm a doctoral student working with Mark Cohen. Thank you for looking into our event problem. I'd like to share a few general comments on the new software as well as an interface issue that I've encountered.
 
The interface feels much more cohesive and organized now that the various controls have moved from separate windows to a single sidebar. I'm glad that I no longer need to drag things around to search for a lost dialog box. This is a great improvement.


to Shafali, me, Andrew, Tessa
I'm a big fan of the separate icons for Acquisition/Review/Tools. I also like the "Not Recording" text that shows up over the EEG waveforms; that indicator makes it so much easier to quickly check that things are working. I've noticed small touches like these that give the program a greater sense of polish.
Thanks Shefali,
I'm really happy to share my experiences if it can benefit others. (Sara W and Adam Naples have heard a fair amount and, of course, Chuck is in the loop).  
I think researchers using EGI will definitely need to stick together as we suspect they may be moving more toward clinical customers.  


Have a wonderful Thanksgiving,  
I do have one issue with the new interface. When the program first starts and whenever the recording stops, Net Station forces you to enter a new patient ID before you can further interact with the software. I assume that this behavior is intended to prevent users from accidentally recording a session without a patient ID. However, this can be rather disruptive, particularly when a user does not intend to save new data. For example, if I want to check the TCP/IP event settings that were in place for a recording that just ended, I first have to enter a patient ID before I can scroll through the control interface, even if I will not record another session. Personally, I would prefer a warning like the "Not Recording" text instead of a required dialog box.
Susan
 
I recognize that the mandatory patient ID dialog box may be a design choice, but it also causes a bigger problem impacting the operating system as a whole. The prompt for the patient ID causes Net Station to remain as the topmost window even if users click to other programs (including Finder, Safari, System Preferences, etc.). I discovered this bug because I needed to check a file to determine the correct patient ID. However, Finder opened in a window hidden behind Net Station. The top panel showed that Finder was the open application, but there was no way to bring the Finder window into view. My only option was to enter a placeholder patient ID so that I could use Finder before re-entering the correct ID. Perhaps you are aware of this issue, but I wanted to point it out just in case.
 
Let me know if you would like any more feedback on these or any other issues.
 
Best,
Austin Head
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com>
11/4/14
 
to Austin, me, supportteam
Dear Austin,
 
Thank you for the feedback.
 
Yes what to do about the patient ID is an open issue, you're not the only person who does not like the current implimentation. I will log your comment into our feature request tracking system
 
I'll also log the detail about NS blocking the finder.
 
Thanks,
 
Mark


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
11/26/14
11/5/14


to Susan, Shafali, Andrew, Tessa
to Andrew  
Hi Susan,
This is to keep you in the loop. We'll need your help


Thanks for the input - I'll forward this over to my colleagues so they have a sense of what's going on, too.  It's really too bad that there's been so many issues with NS5 on both the acquisition and processing ends, and I hope that they'll figure this all out soonI really appreciate that you took the time to share.  I'll be sure to let you know if anything comes up.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
11/12/14
 
to Mark, Austin, supportteam, Agatha, Andrew
Hi Mark,  
 
Thank you for your help with the sync timing we've been experiencing with NS5.
 
I wanted to check in on the progress of testing out our code with NS5We're keen to keep working with NS5, but won't be able to make any progress without figuring out this road block.
 
Please let us know at your earliest convenience.


Thanks,  
Thanks,  
Line 136: Line 271:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com>
11/26/14
11/17/14


to Agatha, Andrew, Austin, Edward
to Mark, Austin, supportteam, Agatha, Andrew  
A colleague collaborating with Shafali in Boston has been working with NS5's processing software and it looks a little grim - see her outline below of the problems they've been encountering as well.
Hi Mark,  


Thanks,  
Before we get hit with the holiday season, wanted to check in again and see if there's any updates on the sync issues we were having with NS5 and Psychtoolbox.  Please let us know - we're eager to continue testing out the new program
 
Thanks,
Sam
Sam


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agatha Lenartowicz <alenarto@ucla.edu>
Gaynor Foster <gfoster@egi.com>
11/26/14
11/17/14
 
to me, Mark, Austin, supportteam, Agatha, Andrew
Dear Sam,
 
I am sorry but we do not have an update for you at the moment. We understand the need for this fix, and will provide you with an update as soon as it is made available to us.
 
Best Wishes,
Gaynor


to me, Andrew, Austin, Edward
Thanks very much Sam - this is all reason to not process in NS5 for us. Though of course any issues pertaining to collecting and extracting data are relevant.


<div style="text-align: center; border: 1px dotted gray;">Return to [[EGI]] main page</div>
<div style="text-align: center; border: 1px dotted gray;">Return to [[EGI]] main page</div>

Latest revision as of 22:53, 28 January 2015

Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 10/27/14

to supportteam, Austin Hi EGI support,

We're in the process of transitioning Net Station 5 into our EEG testing and have been running into some issues:

1) We deliver our stimuli and manage our events from MATLAB. With that said, when we send simultaneous events from MATLAB to Net Station, it says in the event log that "events that exist at the same time as existing events will not be added". Is there a way to fix this issue? There are some experiments in our lab that depend in sending simultaneous events and this would present a big problem. This was not an issue that we had with earlier versions of Net Station.

2) The events that we send to Net Station from MATLAB are recorded properly as they occur in time in the event log; however, when opening the recorded file in Net Station Review, all of the events have the same onset time and occur at the end of the recording, though durations of all events are preserved. We haven't had timing issues in the past and are wondering if there is a set up feature involving timing that we overlooked.

If you could help us solve these issues, this would be great.

Thanks, Sam


Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com> 10/28/14

to me, supportteam, Austin Dear Samantha,

Are you using psychtoolbox? We are investigating a timing issue with the synch method used by Psychtoolbox. Do you have a script known to work with an older version of NS I could test with

I'll need to investigate a bit more on how you were doing simultaneous events before. That was during acquisition I assume?

Can you remind me which lab you are at?

Thanks,

Mark


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to Mark, supportteam, Austin Hi Mark,

Thanks for your reply!

Yes - we are using Psychtoolbox. I'll see if Austin (the one having trouble with the simultaneous events) can send you some code. And yes - we were delivering simultaneous events during acquisition.

We're in Mark Cohen's lab at UCLA.

Send you some code in a bit.

Thanks, Sam


Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com> 10/28/14

to me, supportteam, Austin Dear Samantha,

I'll need to investigate the issues separately, so if you have an experiment known to run in 4.5 that does not have simultaneous events, that would be perfect.

Thanks,

Mark


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to Mark Oh ok - great. Sounds good.


Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> Attachments10/28/14

to me Here's the script. Hold off on sending it; I want to confirm that it works in 4.5 first.

Attachments area Preview attachment testNS5.m

Binary File testNS5.m


Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to me Use this version. It works in NS 4.5 just fine.


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to Austin Perfect! Thanks Austin!


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to Mark, supportteam, Austin Hi Mark,

Here's a code that works fine in NS 4.5 that's been having timing issues in NS 5. Let us know how it goes.

Thanks, Samantha​

testNS5.m

Attachments area Preview attachment testNS5.m

Binary File testNS5.m


Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to me I'd like to point out another issue. Whenever the recording stops, NS forces you to enter a new patient ID before you can interact with the program again. This is very disruptive, particularly when a user does not intend to save new data. If I have finished my session, I shouldn't have to enter a new dummy patient ID (e.g. "asdf") just to look scroll down.

This behavior may be a design choice to prevent users from accidentally running a session without entering the patient ID, but there is a bigger problem. The prompt for the patient ID causes Net Station to remain as the topmost window even if users click to other programs (including Finder, Safari, System Preferences, etc.). The program should never capture focus in that manner. I discovered this bug because I was trying to open Finder to determine the next unused subject number, but the window was not visible. I was forced to enter a placeholder ID so that I could use Finder before re-entering the correct ID.



Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to me Do you want me to email him directly?



Samantha O'Connell Yeah, that would be best. Mind sending your email to him? 10/28/14

Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> 10/28/14

to me Sure. I'll email him.


Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com> 10/28/14

to me, supportteam, Austin Dear Samantha,

Thank you, That's just what I needed.

Thanks,

Mark


Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com> 10/29/14

to me, supportteam, Austin Dear Sam,

I have verified your code works in 4.5 but not in 5.0, I've turned the issue over to the programmers and will let you know what a fix is available.

Thanks,

Mark


Sam O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 10/30/14

to Agatha I guess I can try your code and see if we're running into similar issues, but I'm guessing so because of PTB

Sam O'Connell samroconnell@gmail.com (847) 915-5355

Staff Research Associate Staglin Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, UCLA www.brainmapping.org Think Now, Inc. www.think-now.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com> Date: October 29, 2014 at 3:49:46 PM PDT To: Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> Cc: "supportteam@egi.com" <supportteam@egi.com>, Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> Subject: Re: NS 5 events


Agatha Lenartowicz <alenarto@ucla.edu> 10/30/14

to me Yes pls do. You ought to get Andrew on this as well.


Austin Head <alheadbme@gmail.com> 11/3/14

to Mark, me, supportteam Dear Mark,

I'm a doctoral student working with Mark Cohen. Thank you for looking into our event problem. I'd like to share a few general comments on the new software as well as an interface issue that I've encountered.

The interface feels much more cohesive and organized now that the various controls have moved from separate windows to a single sidebar. I'm glad that I no longer need to drag things around to search for a lost dialog box. This is a great improvement.

I'm a big fan of the separate icons for Acquisition/Review/Tools. I also like the "Not Recording" text that shows up over the EEG waveforms; that indicator makes it so much easier to quickly check that things are working. I've noticed small touches like these that give the program a greater sense of polish.

I do have one issue with the new interface. When the program first starts and whenever the recording stops, Net Station forces you to enter a new patient ID before you can further interact with the software. I assume that this behavior is intended to prevent users from accidentally recording a session without a patient ID. However, this can be rather disruptive, particularly when a user does not intend to save new data. For example, if I want to check the TCP/IP event settings that were in place for a recording that just ended, I first have to enter a patient ID before I can scroll through the control interface, even if I will not record another session. Personally, I would prefer a warning like the "Not Recording" text instead of a required dialog box.

I recognize that the mandatory patient ID dialog box may be a design choice, but it also causes a bigger problem impacting the operating system as a whole. The prompt for the patient ID causes Net Station to remain as the topmost window even if users click to other programs (including Finder, Safari, System Preferences, etc.). I discovered this bug because I needed to check a file to determine the correct patient ID. However, Finder opened in a window hidden behind Net Station. The top panel showed that Finder was the open application, but there was no way to bring the Finder window into view. My only option was to enter a placeholder patient ID so that I could use Finder before re-entering the correct ID. Perhaps you are aware of this issue, but I wanted to point it out just in case.

Let me know if you would like any more feedback on these or any other issues.

Best, Austin Head


Mark Moran <mmoran@egi.com> 11/4/14

to Austin, me, supportteam Dear Austin,

Thank you for the feedback.

Yes what to do about the patient ID is an open issue, you're not the only person who does not like the current implimentation. I will log your comment into our feature request tracking system

I'll also log the detail about NS blocking the finder.

Thanks,

Mark


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 11/5/14

to Andrew This is to keep you in the loop. We'll need your help


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 11/12/14

to Mark, Austin, supportteam, Agatha, Andrew Hi Mark,

Thank you for your help with the sync timing we've been experiencing with NS5.

I wanted to check in on the progress of testing out our code with NS5. We're keen to keep working with NS5, but won't be able to make any progress without figuring out this road block.

Please let us know at your earliest convenience.

Thanks, Sam


Samantha O'Connell <samroconnell@gmail.com> 11/17/14

to Mark, Austin, supportteam, Agatha, Andrew Hi Mark,

Before we get hit with the holiday season, wanted to check in again and see if there's any updates on the sync issues we were having with NS5 and Psychtoolbox. Please let us know - we're eager to continue testing out the new program

Thanks, Sam


Gaynor Foster <gfoster@egi.com> 11/17/14

to me, Mark, Austin, supportteam, Agatha, Andrew Dear Sam,

I am sorry but we do not have an update for you at the moment. We understand the need for this fix, and will provide you with an update as soon as it is made available to us.

Best Wishes, Gaynor


Return to EGI main page